Atul’s Quest
Nader Habibi
*Disclaimer:
All the characters that appear in this story are
fictional. None of them represent any real individual that I have ever met. The story is a work of fiction, and in no way is it intended to provide an account of the lives
or attitudes of any specific
indi viduals or groups.
Nader Habibi
Copyright © January 2003, Nader Habibi First Edition
Acknowledgements
I’m grateful to many individuals who have assisted me with
the background research for this book or have
re- viewed the manuscript and
provided valuable comments
and suggestions. I like to thank Sumiko
Otsubo, Gaiutra Bahadur, R.A. Vasavi,
Timur Kuran, Kevin Paglias, Peter Kilby, Jeffrey Nugent and Warren Samuels for their comments in various stages of this book’s preparation. They are not responsible for any errors and shortcomings of this manuscript.
They do not endorse
any of the unorthodox ideas that are dis- cussed in this book either.
Chapter One
Independent Study Proposal
It was a Friday afternoon in April of 1998. I had just returned
from a two-hour
lecture that ended at 4:30
p.m. and was too tired to do anything. I was sitting
in my office on the third floor of the economics
department at Yale. (I’m not used to going home early even on
Friday nights.) So, even though I was practically brain-dead and could not even find the energy to casually surf the Internet, I decided to relax for a few minutes and try to spend at least two hours on my re- search
before heading home.
The department of economics and its associated re- search centers (like most other offices
at Yale) are spread
around in four old buildings around Hillhouse Avenue
in New Haven. Unfortunately, being a junior faculty member, I had
been condemned to a small and rather
uncomfortable room on the third flood of the main building that also hosted the department’s offices.
My office was no larger than 9X8 feet and had a small narrow
window that did not have much of a view, even if
you stood directly in front of it. Another building about
20 feet away blocked the view. However,
if you
stood to the right of the window and looked to the left, you could see some trees and the intersection of Hillhouse and
Trumbull streets. That afternoon, I was
doing exactly that, except that I was sitting in my chair. I was aimlessly looking
at people who came into my line of vision for only
a few seconds.
Five minutes into this exciting way
of recovering from two hours
of lecturing, I heard a quiet knock
at the door.
“Yes. It’s open.” Again, there was a knock. This time,
I raised my voice: “Come
in, please.” The door
slowly opened. It was one of my former students who had taken a
course with me the previous semester.
“Hello, Dr H. I hope you remember
me from your Public Choice class last term, ’’ he said in a polite voice.
“Yes I remember you, I… I’m sorry. I’m very bad with names. But, please,
come in.’’ He was one of those
attentive and smart students who stand out within the first few
sessions. He sometimes asked very tough
questions. Nonetheless, when you teach 50 to 70 new students every semester, it is hard to remember
their names after the term is over.
“Oh,
I’m Atul Divan. Do you have a minute?” “Yes. Yes, Atul. How are you? Have a seat.”
Atul was trying to catch his breath while sitting down and putting his large black
backpack on the floor. He was a short fellow - only 5.4” -
and very skinny. He must have been a second-generation immigrant, because,
while he looked like a typical person from the Indian subcontinent, he did not have an Indian accent. His
face was bony, and one could not help
but notice his large cheekbones. The good thing about having your
office on the third floor of an old building is that you and anyone who comes to visit you get a good
workout. Noticing that he was still breathing heavily, I commented : “At least
it’s good for your heart.
Isn’t it?” Then I waited for him
to tell me the purpose of his visit. My guess was that he was here to ask for a recommendation letter, since ex-students rarely contact their
former teachers for any other purpose.
“Dr. H, I was wondering
if I could take an independent
study course with you next fall?”
My answer was going to be negative, because I was very busy back then trying to complete my latest re- search
paper. And besides, I did not have a good experience with
supervising individual studies (IS) before.
Last time I supervised an IS course, the student did not want to do the required readings.
She didn’t do a good job on her term papers either.
At the end, she filed a complaint
against me and claimed
that I expected too much. However, I thought it would be impolite
to reject Atul’s request
immediately. Besides, he might take
another course with me in the future and give me a bad teacher evaluation. So I asked
if he had a
specific topic in mind.
“Yes, I do. It is a rather unusual
topic that I have been thinking about for a long time. I would like to show
that non-whites should improve their racial beauty through
marriage with whites.
I believe this is
the only way that non-whites could overcome their socioeconomic rejection and achieve
full integration into American society”.
I was taken by surprise by this idea, especially since it came from an Indian-born student
whose own skin color was
dark. Atul’s complexion was
even darker than that of most Indians.
“Could you run that by me one more time,” I said, as I leaned forward in my chair.. “Did you say you want to show that non-whites
should improve their
racial beauty?!!” I asked with a polite smile. I wanted to tell him that this vague idea was not an economic topic, but first
I wanted to know what the topic was exactly.
“I understand this is a controversial issue,
but I’m very curious about it. What I mean is that, when it comes to beauty, whites enjoy a comparative advantage relative to
other races. While everyone talks about overcoming
discrimination and achieving racial equality, I have never heard any talk of racial improvement. The fact is that, even though there
are no proven differences in
the physical and intellectual capacity of different
races, the level of physical attractiveness is higher among some
races than others. I want to show that it is good for those who are less attractive
as a race to improve
their physical beauty
by biological intervention.” Atul’s
face was very serious throughout
this explanation until the last few words about
biological intervention. He said these last words with a meaningful smile. I had wanted to laugh much earlier,
but did not think it was appropriate. So, as
soon as I saw the smile on his face, I started
laughing, and Atul’s smile
turned into laughter in conformity. “I told you it’s an unusual topic,”
said Atul, while trying to show
that he was not disturbed by my laughter.
“It is a very unusual
and, I should say, a very sensitive issue,” I responded
while nodding my head in approval and continued with a more serious tone: “I think you must talk to one of the professors in the sociology or psychology departments about this topic. They would know
a lot more about these issues.
Unfortunately I don’t have enough knowledge in this area to be able to guide your study.” It is not un- common for professors to reject a
request like Atul’s by
referring
it to other departments and trying to sound
encouraging.
“I agree with you that this issue
is not directly related
to economics. I contacted one of my professors
in the sociology department last week, but he was not interested. He said it was offensive
to minorities and there was no scientific proof for my argument. I’m glad your reaction is not as harsh as his. He only gave me three minutes of his time and advised
me to drop the idea altogether. I also contacted
a professor of ethnic studies who is from
Latin America. His reaction was even
worse. He said such ideas would give racists added ammunition to abuse non-whites and ridicule them. I came to you because, of all
the professors that I have taken
courses with here at Yale, you are
the most open-minded one. Also, you
were always interested in the sociological and political aspects of
economic be- havior, and I figured you
probably must have
had formal
training in one of these areas,’’ said
Atul.
I was not about to change my
mind because of Atul’s flattering
remarks about the range of my knowledge. I did not need this
distraction at this point in my life. “I have to agree with the concerns of these two professors. This is a very controversial
issue, and some people might even find it offensive. I don’t think I can convince the
department to approve
a non- economic and sensitive
topic like this one for independent
study. As you might be aware, when an in- dependent study course is approved, the department assigns another faculty member, in
addition to the supervisor,
as a reviewer. Students must write at least three term papers for an independent
study course, and these
must all be approved by the reviewer as well. Even
if I accept your argument,
I doubt that another professor would agree to put his
approval signature on
a paper whose basic assumption is that some races are physically, I mean from the standpoint of beauty, inferior. I’m sure you are well aware of the crimes that have been committed in the name of racial superiority throughout
human history. So I’m afraid
I can’t help you
with this idea. However, if you have other topics in mind that are related
to my field of concentration, we can talk about
them. “
Atul understood that I wanted to end the conversation. It was clear that
he was disappointed. He picked
up his bag and stood up to leave. Then suddenly he looked at me and said, “What if I
rephrased my idea so that it involved
economic concepts. After all, I have taken so many economics courses that, subconsciously, I look at the world through
an economic lens. Would you
be interested to consider it then? This topic means a lot to me, and I don’t think anyone else would be willing
to help me.” His persistence was understandable.
Students who choose to
do an individual study project
are often very religious about the topic, or
they would not insist on it. However, I was not about to say yes. If I agree to supervise an independent study project, it has to be on a topic
related to my own re- search.
That way, I could use the student
for literature search and statistical
assistance. Cynical as it might sound,
this is a tradition in academia. Again I politely declined: “I can’t see how this issue could
be related to economics, but I suggest you do a little bit of literature review and organize your thoughts in a more scientific format. For starters, you are simply making a few nor- mative
statements about the beauty differential among races and then
making a moral judgment that non- whites should engage in interracial
marriage to improve their racial beauty. I hope you remember the difference between normative and positive concepts.
Science is primarily
about observation and positive statements.
Rather than making value judgments, you should try to prove your points. First
of all, how do you know that whites are more beautiful? Do non-whites think that whites are more beautiful, or
is it just the ethnocentric
perception of whites
themselves? How do you
measure beauty to begin with? Besides, even if
you show that whites are more attractive, you have to demonstrate why any group of people
will give up its traditional method of reproduction, meaning marriage, to
reproduce eugenically just for sake of changing its physical appearance.’’
Atul raised his hand as a request for interruption. I paused. “Excuse
me. What does 'eugenically' mean?” Atul asked.
“See. That’s just what I mean.
If you are interested in this topic, you should do a lot of reading about race and the history
of race relations. Eugenics is the process
of selective breeding and other activities that are intended to improve
a race or ethnic group based on a
predefined criteria,” I replied.
“I thought you did not know anything
about these issues,'' said Atul
with a smile.
“I know very little. Eugenics is common
knowledge. It was a popular topic before World War II. I have read a
few articles about it in popular magazines. If you are seriously interested in this topic, I suggest you look into
it.” Atul wanted to drag the conversation, but I was too tired
and I did not want to commit
myself further. Still
standing and slightly bending to the left under the weight of his backpack, he asked if he could stop by again and talk
about this issue further, after doing a little
more reading.
“I guess if you stop by during my office
hours, it’s fine. But I can’t imagine how I can be of further help.’’
I could have helped him - if nothing else, at least by
giving him general guidelines on how to formulate his thoughts. I was not as ignorant about the topic as I
wanted him to think either.
But I had to avoid all distractions and concentrate on my own
research. Getting one more paper
accepted for publication was crucial for
my tenure approval. I promised
myself to be nicer to students after I was promoted to associate professorship.